Langsung ke konten utama

Biaya mengejar kanker

Pengobatan di jaman modern ini tidak jarang malah lebih menghasilkan akibat buruk daripada baik. Statistik menunjukkan banyak pasien meninggal karena pengobatan. Berikut ini artikel tanggal 10 Maret 2014 dari majalah Time oleh seorang ahli bedah kanker mengenai "biaya" yang harus ditebus pasien untuk mencari dan mengobati kanker tersebut.

The Cost of Chasing Cancer

Why excessive screening can cause unintended harm, stress and waste
By Marty Makary

As a surgeon, I'm trained to crush cancer. For many years, every tumor I palpated and family I counseled drove me to hunt for cancer with a vengeance, using every tool modern medicine has to offer. But recently, one patient reminded me that the quest to seek and destroy cancer can produce collateral damage.

The patient's story began with a full-body CT scan--a screening test used to detect tumors--that revealed a cyst on his pancreas. Some 3% of people have these cysts, and they are rarely problematic. Based on the cyst's size and features, there was no clear answer as to what to do about it, but he was given options.

The patient tossed and turned at night, agonizing over stories of pancreatic-cancer tragedies, consumed by the dilemma of whether to risk surgery to remove the cyst or leave it alone. The conundrum strained his marriage and distracted him from his work.

Months before I met him, the patient underwent the surgery, which revealed that the cyst was no threat to his health. The operation was supposed to cost $25,000 and require eight weeks off work. But the toll was much greater, including a debilitating surgical complication.

I thought, This is why he shouldn't have had a CT scan in the first place. Screening made him sick.


New research finds that some Health-screening efforts have gone too far. A recent study found that yearly mammograms do not prolong the lives of low-risk women ages 40 to 59. Following more than 89,000 women for 25 years in a randomized controlled trial (the gold standard of science), the study is as methodologically impressive as they come. As hard as it is for our pro-screening culture to believe, the data are clear. We are taxing far too many women not only with needless and sometimes humiliating X-rays but also with unnecessary follow-up surgery.

The annual mammogram is not the only vintage medical recommendation under scrutiny. Another large study found that among low-risk adults, taking a daily aspirin--a recommendation hammered into me in medical school--can cause significant gastrointestinal or cerebral bleeding that offsets any cardiac benefits. Doctors are also re-evaluating calls for regular prostate-specific antigen tests and surgical colposcopies after "borderline" Pap smear results because of the risks of chasing false positives and indolent disease.

The problem of unintentional harm is far bigger than many suspect. The Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services reports that among Medicare patients alone, it contributes to 180,000 deaths annually. On a national level, if unintentionally harming patients in the process of trying to improve their health were a disease, it would rank as the No. 3 cause of death in the U.S., using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stats.

In this era of rising medical prices, cutting waste should be the top priority, especially when that waste pulls doctors away from the important work of caring for sick patients. A 2012 Institute of Medicine report concludes that Americans spend as much as one-third of their health care dollars on tests, medicine, procedures and administrative burdens that do not improve health outcomes.

The patient I met also taught me about another negative outcome, one that does not show up in the national stats: emotional trauma from false alarms. The patient recounted feeling tormented by the idea that he might be harboring a precancerous time bomb. His distress arose not from cancer but from medicine's limited ability to interpret a normal variation of anatomy discovered by new technology.

The good news is that a grassroots movement within medicine is identifying unnecessary tests and procedures to educate doctors and the public about them. The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation has been asking medical-specialty associations to name the five most overdone tests and procedures within their specialty. The campaign so far includes more than 60 doctors' societies.

Reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment will require broadening medicine's focus beyond hunting and killing disease to sound research and education on appropriate care. We all must come to grips with the public's expectation for more medicine. New research is capturing what individual stories, like that of my patient, have been trying to teach us: we have a quiet epidemic of unnecessary, costly and sometimes harmful medical care.

(Makary is a cancer surgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital and an associate professor of health policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)


Postingan populer dari blog ini

Kemoterapi adalah racun yang mematikan

Mengenai kemoterapi menurut Hiromi Shinya di buku " The Miracle of Enzyme " (2005): Masalah terbesar adalah obat-obatan menguras sejumlah besar enzim pangkal. Dari seluruh obat-obatan yang ada, yang paling keras adalah obat anti-kanker... Oleh karena obat-obatan kemoterapi adalah racun yang mematikan, saya tidak akan menggunakan kecuali dalam situasi yang benar-benar luar biasa. Contohnya, bahkan jika kanker ditemukan di usus besar di dalam kelenjar getah bening, saya tidak akan menggunakan kemoterapi. Program perawatan saya terdiri dari pertama-tama mengabil bagian yang terserang kanker melalui pembedahan, dan setelah kanker yang terlihat itu diambil, saya mulai menyingkirkan hal yang menurut saya mungkin menyebabkan kanker pada pasien itu. Tentu saja, pertama-tama saya memerintahkan mereka untuk menghindari tembakau (rokok) dan alkohol, dan berhenti total mengonsumsi daging, susu sapi, dan produk-produk dari susu sapi. Sambil menjalani Diet dan Gaya Hidup Kea

Air putih minuman terbaik

Mengenai minum air putih menurut Hiromi Shinya di buku " The Miracle of Enzyme " (2005): Satu “kebiasaan baik” yang saya praktikkan setiap hari adalah meminum sekitar 500ml air setiap satu jam sebelum makan. Sering orang berkata bahwa sebaiknya anda banyak minum air yang baik setiap hari untuk kesehatan. Sama halnya ada waktu yang baik untuk makan, ada pula waktu yang baik untuk minum. Saya yakin, mereka yang menanam sendiri tanaman mereka mengerti akan hal ini. Toh, pengairan yang berlebihan bagi tanaman akan menyebabkan akar membusuk, dan tanaman akan layu dan mati. Seperti halnya ada periode waktu dan banyaknya air yang sesuai untuk menyiram tanaman, hal yang sama juga dapat dikatakan mengenai mengonsumsi air bagi manusia. Tubuh manusia sebagian besar tersusun oleh air. Bayi dan anak-anak kecil terdiri dari kira-kira 80% air, orang dewasa 60-70%, dan manula 50-60%. Bayi memiliki kulit yang tampak segar dan muda karena sel-sel mereka mengandung banyak air. San

Mempelajari bagaimana tidak makan sama pentingnya

Learning How Not to Eat Is As Important As Learning What to Eat Our ancient ancestors often went long periods without food triggering a survival phenomena that activated a powerful category of enzymes I call Newzymes. These Newzymes shredded the defective protein in their cells and through a process called apoptosis recycled the waste protein into new good protein capable of repairing the cells of the body’s vital organs. Thus our ancestors could go for a long period of time without food and not only survive but also clean out the bad protein in their cells. Our body today still has that efficient “Recycling System” which is part of our “Innate Immune System.” Our innate immune system is our oldest immune function but we are just now coming to understand it and how to work with it to protect our health. Two Noble prizes were awarded in the last few years for helping to identify this process. That is why I am saying we are at the beginning of a “Health Revolution.” This H