Langsung ke konten utama

Biaya mengejar kanker

Pengobatan di jaman modern ini tidak jarang malah lebih menghasilkan akibat buruk daripada baik. Statistik menunjukkan banyak pasien meninggal karena pengobatan. Berikut ini artikel tanggal 10 Maret 2014 dari majalah Time oleh seorang ahli bedah kanker mengenai "biaya" yang harus ditebus pasien untuk mencari dan mengobati kanker tersebut.

The Cost of Chasing Cancer

Why excessive screening can cause unintended harm, stress and waste
By Marty Makary

As a surgeon, I'm trained to crush cancer. For many years, every tumor I palpated and family I counseled drove me to hunt for cancer with a vengeance, using every tool modern medicine has to offer. But recently, one patient reminded me that the quest to seek and destroy cancer can produce collateral damage.

The patient's story began with a full-body CT scan--a screening test used to detect tumors--that revealed a cyst on his pancreas. Some 3% of people have these cysts, and they are rarely problematic. Based on the cyst's size and features, there was no clear answer as to what to do about it, but he was given options.

The patient tossed and turned at night, agonizing over stories of pancreatic-cancer tragedies, consumed by the dilemma of whether to risk surgery to remove the cyst or leave it alone. The conundrum strained his marriage and distracted him from his work.

Months before I met him, the patient underwent the surgery, which revealed that the cyst was no threat to his health. The operation was supposed to cost $25,000 and require eight weeks off work. But the toll was much greater, including a debilitating surgical complication.

I thought, This is why he shouldn't have had a CT scan in the first place. Screening made him sick.


New research finds that some Health-screening efforts have gone too far. A recent study found that yearly mammograms do not prolong the lives of low-risk women ages 40 to 59. Following more than 89,000 women for 25 years in a randomized controlled trial (the gold standard of science), the study is as methodologically impressive as they come. As hard as it is for our pro-screening culture to believe, the data are clear. We are taxing far too many women not only with needless and sometimes humiliating X-rays but also with unnecessary follow-up surgery.

The annual mammogram is not the only vintage medical recommendation under scrutiny. Another large study found that among low-risk adults, taking a daily aspirin--a recommendation hammered into me in medical school--can cause significant gastrointestinal or cerebral bleeding that offsets any cardiac benefits. Doctors are also re-evaluating calls for regular prostate-specific antigen tests and surgical colposcopies after "borderline" Pap smear results because of the risks of chasing false positives and indolent disease.

The problem of unintentional harm is far bigger than many suspect. The Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services reports that among Medicare patients alone, it contributes to 180,000 deaths annually. On a national level, if unintentionally harming patients in the process of trying to improve their health were a disease, it would rank as the No. 3 cause of death in the U.S., using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stats.

In this era of rising medical prices, cutting waste should be the top priority, especially when that waste pulls doctors away from the important work of caring for sick patients. A 2012 Institute of Medicine report concludes that Americans spend as much as one-third of their health care dollars on tests, medicine, procedures and administrative burdens that do not improve health outcomes.

The patient I met also taught me about another negative outcome, one that does not show up in the national stats: emotional trauma from false alarms. The patient recounted feeling tormented by the idea that he might be harboring a precancerous time bomb. His distress arose not from cancer but from medicine's limited ability to interpret a normal variation of anatomy discovered by new technology.

The good news is that a grassroots movement within medicine is identifying unnecessary tests and procedures to educate doctors and the public about them. The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation has been asking medical-specialty associations to name the five most overdone tests and procedures within their specialty. The campaign so far includes more than 60 doctors' societies.

Reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment will require broadening medicine's focus beyond hunting and killing disease to sound research and education on appropriate care. We all must come to grips with the public's expectation for more medicine. New research is capturing what individual stories, like that of my patient, have been trying to teach us: we have a quiet epidemic of unnecessary, costly and sometimes harmful medical care.

(Makary is a cancer surgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital and an associate professor of health policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)


Postingan populer dari blog ini

Akhir dari pengobatan modern

WHO mengeluarkan amaran pada bulan Maret 2012 tentang bahaya kekebalan kuman (mikroorganisme) terhadap antibiotik. Mungkinkah ini akhir dari pengobatan modern? Namun hal ini tidak perlu ditakuti jika nasihat tentang semua obat adalah racun yang ditulis lebih dari seratus tahun yang lalu, dan kini dikuatkan oleh para ahli (lihat juga artikel ini tentang obat sebagai resiko ), diindahkan. Simak artikel berikut yang kami kutip dari thestar online. An end to modern medicine? GLOBAL TRENDS By MARTIN KHOR A warning by the head of WHO that antibiotic resistance is so serious that it may lead to an end to modern medicine should alert health authorities to contain this most serious health crisis. LAST week, the head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) sounded a large alarm bell on how antibiotics may in future not work anymore, due to resistance of bacteria to the medicines. Antibiotic resistance has been a growing problem for some time now. From time to time, there will be

Gula dimana-mana dan penyebab kecanduan

Sudah menjadi teori yang semakin umum bahwa gula adalah penyebab berbagai penyakit. Masalahnya, gula juga adalah "addictive", yaitu menyebabkan kecanduan. Berikut tulisan yang muncul di New York Times tanggal 22 Desember 2014. Musim Gula. Di Mana Saja, dan Membuat Ketagihan. Oleh JAMES J. DiNICOLANTONIO dan SEAN C. LUCAN Rekan kerja Anda membawakan brownies, putri Anda membuat kue untuk pesta liburan, dan permen datang dari kerabat jauh. Gula ada dimana-mana. Itu adalah perayaan, itu adalah pesta, itu adalah cinta. Itu juga berbahaya. Dalam penelitian terbaru, kami menunjukkan bahwa gula, mungkin lebih dari garam, berkontribusi pada perkembangan penyakit kardiovaskular. Bukti juga berkembang, bahwa makan terlalu banyak gula dapat menyebabkan penyakit hati berlemak, hipertensi, diabetes tipe 2, obesitas, dan penyakit ginjal. Namun orang tidak bisa menolak. Dan alasannya cukup sederhana. Gula membuat ketagihan. Dan yang kami maksud bukan membuat ketagihan seperti orang be

Apakah mungkin bebas dari sakit? Tentu saja!

Tubuh manusia diciptakan Tuhan untuk bertahan dari serangan penyakit. Pertahanan ini disebut imunitas. Bahkan saat kondisi tidak ideal lagi dan tubuh akhirnya sakit, tubuh diciptakan untuk menyembuhkan diri sendiri. Sayangnya, kebanyakan manusia modern memiliki pola hidup yang sudah jauh dari pola hidup ideal. Ini menyebabkan tubuh tidak lagi mampu untuk bertahan dari serangan penyakit, sehingga tidak jarang akhirnya jatuh sakit. Dan bukan hanya jatuh sakit, tapi susah sembuh, bahkan akhirnya menyerah sehingga meninggal. Dunia medis modern juga pada umumnya tidak begitu membantu, sebab dunia medis modern tidak lagi menganut paham "tubuh menyembuhkan diri sendiri" melainkan pada umumnya bergantung kepada obat-obatan kimia. Kebanyakan, jika tidak semua, obat-obatan kimia terlihat seperti menyembuhkan, tetapi sebenarnya hanya "menyembunyikan" sementara penyakit, untuk timbul lagi, biasanya dalam intensitas yang lebih besar. Situs ini bertujuan menunjukka